Refactoring (#1201)

* Some initial refactoring

* Make it one application

* Got it working

* Fix problem on Windows

* Move WebWolf

* Move first lesson

* Moved all lessons

* Fix pom.xml

* Fix tests

* Add option to initialize a lesson

This way we can create content for each user inside a lesson. The initialize method will be called when a new user is created or when a lesson reset happens

* Clean up pom.xml files

* Remove fetching labels based on language.

We only support English at the moment, all the lesson explanations are written in English which makes it very difficult to translate. If we only had labels it would make sense to support multiple languages

* Fix SonarLint issues

* And move it all to the main project

* Fix for documentation paths

* Fix pom warnings

* Remove PMD as it does not work

* Update release notes about refactoring

Update release notes about refactoring

Update release notes about refactoring

* Fix lesson template

* Update release notes

* Keep it in the same repo in Dockerhub

* Update documentation to show how the connection is obtained.

Resolves: #1180

* Rename all integration tests

* Remove command from Dockerfile

* Simplify GitHub actions

Currently, we use a separate actions for pull-requests and branch build.
This is now consolidated in one action.
The PR action triggers always, it now only trigger when the PR is
opened and not in draft.
Running all platforms on a branch build is a bit too much, it is better
 to only run all platforms when someone opens a PR.

* Remove duplicate entry from release notes

* Add explicit registry for base image

* Lesson scanner not working when fat jar

When running the fat jar we have to take into account we
are reading from the jar file and not the filesystem. In
this case you cannot use `getFile` for example.

* added info in README and fixed release docker

* changed base image and added ignore file

Co-authored-by: Zubcevic.com <rene@zubcevic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Nanne Baars
2022-04-09 14:56:12 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent f3d8206a07
commit 711649924b
1130 changed files with 3540 additions and 7643 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
=== Automatic support from frameworks
Most frameworks now have default support for preventing CSRF. For example with Angular an interceptor reads a token
from a cookie by default XSRF-TOKEN and sets it as an HTTP header, X-XSRF-TOKEN. Since only code that runs on your domain
could read the cookie, the backend can be certain that the HTTP request came from your client application and not an attacker.
In order for this to work the backend server sets the token in a cookie. As the value of the cookie should be read
by Angular (JavaScript) this cookie should not be marked with the http-only flag. On every request towards the server
Angular will put the token in the X-XSRF-TOKEN as a HTTP header. The server can validate whether those two tokens
match and this will ensure the server the request is running on the same domain.
*Important: DEFINE A SEPARATE COOKIE, DO NOT REUSE THE SESSION COOKIE*
Remember the session cookie should always be defined with http-only flag.
== Custom headers not safe
Another defense can be to add a custom request header to each call. This will work if all the interactions
with the server are performed with JavaScript. On the server side you only need to check the presence of this header
if this header is not present deny the request.
Some frameworks offer this implementation by default however researcer Alex Infuhr found out that this can be bypassed
as well. You can read about: https://insert-script.blogspot.com/2018/05/adobe-reader-pdf-client-side-request.html[Adobe Reader PDF - Client Side Request Injection]