Fix printing of negative offset with settime command

This commit is contained in:
Miroslav Lichvar
2013-06-14 19:18:36 +02:00
parent 6d7605a3d0
commit 0193688671
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@@ -2356,7 +2356,7 @@ process_cmd_settime(char *line)
request.command = htons(REQ_SETTIME);
if (request_reply(&request, &reply, RPY_MANUAL_TIMESTAMP, 1)) {
offset_cs = ntohl(reply.data.manual_timestamp.centiseconds);
offset = 0.01 * (double) offset_cs;
offset = 0.01 * (double)(int32_t)offset_cs;
dfreq_ppm = UTI_FloatNetworkToHost(reply.data.manual_timestamp.dfreq_ppm);
new_afreq_ppm = UTI_FloatNetworkToHost(reply.data.manual_timestamp.new_afreq_ppm);
printf("Clock was %.2f seconds fast. Frequency change = %.2fppm, new frequency = %.2fppm\n",

View File

@@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ handle_settime(CMD_Request *rx_message, CMD_Reply *tx_message)
if (MNL_AcceptTimestamp(&ts, &offset_cs, &dfreq_ppm, &new_afreq_ppm)) {
tx_message->status = htons(STT_SUCCESS);
tx_message->reply = htons(RPY_MANUAL_TIMESTAMP);
tx_message->data.manual_timestamp.centiseconds = htonl(offset_cs);
tx_message->data.manual_timestamp.centiseconds = htonl((int32_t)offset_cs);
tx_message->data.manual_timestamp.dfreq_ppm = UTI_FloatHostToNetwork(dfreq_ppm);
tx_message->data.manual_timestamp.new_afreq_ppm = UTI_FloatHostToNetwork(new_afreq_ppm);
} else {